The Basics: This
is a 2013 Disney action/adventure film directed by Sam Raimi and is an origin
story to the 1939 MGM classic “The Wizard
of Oz”. Now this movie is more of a spiritual predecessor to “The Wizard of Oz” and it is also not
directly based on any one of Frank Baum’s Oz
novels. With that in mind it isn’t completely fair to constantly compare it to
the 1939 film. However, the creators of this film should have anticipated the
comparison of the two films, so I will do so even if only a moderate amount.
Plot: The story
here is pretty straightforward and predictable due to it being a prequel to a
very widely known movie. That is by no means a bad thing, but there are certain
things we know will and won’t happen. Oz is a magician who (very similarly to Dorothy)
gets whisked away by a tornado in Kansas to the strange and wonderful world of
Oz. He is the prophesized hero of the land and must defeat the wicked witch to
claim his throne in the emerald city. We see the origin of the wicked witch we
all know so well, as well as several other small things from the original film.
While all of this is great, there are some points that bother me. Why on earth
are Oz and Glinda (the good witch) romantically involved? I suppose they
simply wanted there to be a romantic interest, but this seems completely unnecessary
to me. This relationship is in no way alluded to in the original film and is
probably just an added plot device for the sake of having it. Also, the wicked
witch of the west makes her official transformation by biting an apple that is
given to her by her sister (the wicked witch of the east). The apple is never
mentioned before or after the scene. The one single corrupting bite from an
evil green apple seems cliché and rushed. While the story has minor flaws, it
is solid enough to keep a good pace and get everything where it needs to go.
Acting: This film
has a great and diverse cast. I very much like James Franco as Oz and he does a
good job developing the character. What made this movie for me though, were the
supporting characters. Finely the flying monkey (Zach Braff), the China girl
(Joey King), and Knuck the fanfare player (Tony Cox) are the most loveable
characters of the film. They also seem to be just as, if not more, developed
than the main characters. What I don’t like is Mila Kunis. I really like Mila
Kunis as an actress, and she was doing great for the first half of the film.
Then she became evil and it all went down the drain. Mila is simply not an evil
witch. She cannot pull off a sinister character, or any scenes with vividly
strong emotions for that matter. When she was crying, it seemed forced; when
she was screaming in rage, it sounded stupid and unintimidating. Mila is also
much too attractive to be playing a witch that is supposed to be repulsive.
Evil witches should not have such nice bodies. It’s just weird and
slightly uncomfortable. As a whole the acting is pretty good, and some of the
supporting characters go on to be one of the best things about the film.
Effects: The
special effects are one of the films strongest points. The landscapes are
colorful and vivid. All of the CGI looks vibrant and other-worldly. The only
drawback being that we have seen this all before. The environment doesn’t
differ much from those in movies like Avatar,
Alice in Wonderland, The Chronicles of Narnia, Journey to the Center of the
Earth, The Neverending Story, etc. This makes all the splendor seem a
little less exciting. It is worth noting that in the 1939 film, the flying
monkeys seemed more mischievous than threatening. However, in this film they
are quite savage and dangerous looking. They were surprisingly scary for a PG
movie and definitely were a tad more daunting then their 1939 brothers. The
special effects are very good though, and all of the color and liveliness make the film
visually pleasing to watch.
Additional Comments: I was disappointed early on
in the film by cursing and a sexual joke. This is like a PG Disney movie about
Oz, and it caught me off guard. It doesn’t bother me too much, but I had
expected a bit better. Also, there are singing munchkins in this film, which
was a great relief to me and a huge plus. If I went through this entire film
and there were no dancing and singing little people, I would have been very
upset.
Conclusion: It
isn’t the best written or acted movie ever and it isn’t completely true to its
roots. The movie isn’t
totally fresh and you may see traces of several other movies in it. It also has a good amount of oddly attractive witches. Having said
all that, it is a fun enough journey with likeable characters and appealing CG.
Buy, Rent, or Pass?
Rent- This movie is on the lower end of rent. It isn’t
something you just have to see and it’s a ride you’ve probably gone on before,
but it is good. I can appreciate what the people sought to create here and the
effort that went into it. If nothing else watch it for the munchkins, hot
witches, and pretty colors.
No comments:
Post a Comment